Foro de Filatelia Argentina

Otin » 30 Sep 2010 22:28 escribió: Rein:
I saw your enlargements of the the typo and offset 5c San Martín and I can tell you that the laurel branches in the typos do not show fruits (or sprouts?) The offset version do show them, represented by the little circles among the leaves. In my book Sistemas de Impresión I do emntion that difference.

Vi sus ampliaiones del 5c San Martín tipo y offset y le puedo decir que las ramas de laurel en los tipografiados no muestran los frutos (o brotes). La versión offset si las muestra, representadas por los pequeños circulitos entre las hojas. En mi libro Sistemas de Impresión yo destaco esa diferencia.
Saludos,
Merlo

stamps9407 escribió:I scanned those stamps to save some scanning time. Those stamps are only present in MI1 paper. But is giving me some trouble are the San Martin stamps

Thanks

Sergio

stamps9407 escribió:Rein, yeah to reduce it to a width of 900 pixels reduce the quality a lot

Here you will find a 300dpi scan. If it is not good enough I'll need to scan it again.

Thanks
Sergio

The 5c José de San Martin stamps exist in both offset-litho and in typography. And as to the offset-litho according to Samuel Klass there are even subdivisions of this offset-litho a.o. the hueco-offset!

No catalogue-maker indicates that there is a basic difference in design!

In offset-litho in full:



in typography in full:



in offset-litho the fragment:



in typography the fragment:



In offset-litho the details of the leaves that show nice little circles:




In typography the details of the leaves:

stamps9407 escribió:I don't have much time today, I'll do it tomorrow. In the meanwhile a question:

I already read this article but I had discarded because I didn't find a relationship between this and the paper. Is there a relation other than knowing what printing method was used on each paper?

Regards
Sergio